5. Realized Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel for the complainant further argued that during the investigation of your case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led to your recovery of sleeping tablets on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has become produced before the Court wherein the sleeping supplements were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected in the liver but not from the tummy. For this reason, the recovery of said sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel to the complainant have also argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Bhoora led towards the recovery of a motorcycle.
14. During the light of the position explained higher than, it is actually concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the size of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment around the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that whilst the crime of murder was proven, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for taking into consideration mitigating factors during sentencing.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed in the bank and because only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
three. I have read the uncovered counsel for that parties and have absent through the record of this case with their in a position assistance.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority 10 case study on law of contract entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
The ruling of the first court created case legislation that must be accompanied by other courts right up until or Except either new legislation is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the pair experienced two young children of their own at home, the social worker didn't notify them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report for the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced younger children.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected for the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a possible fine.
Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation with the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is critical for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and selling transparency.
PACER allows everyone with an account to search and Find appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for your PACER account.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it really is important that the case set up the application on the precautionary principle where there is often a danger to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations from the State in protecting the right to the clean and healthy environment.
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.